1980 Lotus Eclat vs. 2004 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2004 Nissan Murano is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Murano (246 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1980 Lotus Eclat. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1980 Lotus Eclat. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Murano weights approximately 731 kg more than 1980 Lotus Eclat. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Lotus Eclat. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Murano (323 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Lotus Eclat. (217 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Lotus Eclat.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lotus Eclat | 2004 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Lotus | Nissan |
Model | Eclat | Murano |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2174 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 246 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 323 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 80 L |