1980 Lotus Eclat vs. 2005 Subaru Outback Sport
To start off, 2005 Subaru Outback Sport is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Subaru Outback Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Subaru Outback Sport weights approximately 380 kg more than 1980 Lotus Eclat.
Because 2005 Subaru Outback Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Lotus Eclat. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Outback Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lotus Eclat | 2005 Subaru Outback Sport | |
Make | Lotus | Subaru |
Model | Eclat | Outback Sport |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 165 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2660 mm |