1980 Lotus Eclat vs. 2006 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lotus Eclat would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 193 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Because 1980 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lotus Eclat | 2006 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Lotus | Volkswagen |
Model | Eclat | Citi |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 857 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2410 mm |