1980 Lotus Eclat vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lotus Eclat would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Roadster weights approximately 145 kg more than 1980 Lotus Eclat.
Because 1980 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lotus Eclat | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Lotus | Mini |
Model | Eclat | Roadster |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3728 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2467 mm |