1980 Maserati Khamsin vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Maserati Khamsin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Maserati Khamsin would be higher. At 4,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Maserati Khamsin is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Maserati Khamsin weights approximately 661 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Because 1980 Maserati Khamsin is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Maserati Khamsin. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Maserati Khamsin | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | Khamsin | Midge |
Year Released | 1980 | 1994 |
Engine Size | 4898 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1019 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1400 mm |