1980 Maserati Khamsin vs. 1996 Renault Megane
To start off, 1996 Renault Megane is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Maserati Khamsin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Maserati Khamsin would be higher. At 4,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Maserati Khamsin is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Maserati Khamsin weights approximately 348 kg more than 1996 Renault Megane.
Because 1980 Maserati Khamsin is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Maserati Khamsin. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Renault Megane has automatic transmission and 1980 Maserati Khamsin has manual transmission. 1980 Maserati Khamsin will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Renault Megane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Maserati Khamsin | 1996 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Maserati | Renault |
| Model | Khamsin | Megane |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 4898 cc | 1647 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 88 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1332 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2680 mm |
