1980 Maserati Khamsin vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Maserati Khamsin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Maserati Khamsin would be higher. At 4,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Maserati Khamsin is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 36 kg more than 1980 Maserati Khamsin.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1980 Maserati Khamsin has manual transmission. 1980 Maserati Khamsin will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Maserati Khamsin | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Maserati | Jeep |
| Model | Khamsin | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Size | 4898 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1716 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |
