1980 Maserati Merak vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 399 more horse power than 1980 Maserati Merak. (157 HP @ 7100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1980 Maserati Merak. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 559 kg more than 1980 Maserati Merak. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Maserati Merak | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Maserati | Cadillac |
| Model | Merak | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 556 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2880 mm |
