1980 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 1984 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1984 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1984 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1984 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 201 kg more than 1984 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | 1984 Skoda Rapid R | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Skoda |
| Model | Murena | Rapid R |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2156 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 91.7 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.6 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1051 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2410 mm |
