1980 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 1986 Peugeot 309
To start off, 1986 Peugeot 309 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1986 Peugeot 309. (64 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1986 Peugeot 309. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 181 kg more than 1986 Peugeot 309. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Peugeot 309, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | 1986 Peugeot 309 | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Peugeot |
| Model | Murena | 309 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2156 cc | 1294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1051 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2480 mm |
