1980 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 1990 Renault Alpine
To start off, 1990 Renault Alpine is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,458 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Renault Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Renault Alpine (182 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Renault Alpine should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Renault Alpine weights approximately 159 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | 1990 Renault Alpine | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Renault |
| Model | Murena | Alpine |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2156 cc | 2458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 91.7 mm | 91.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.6 mm | 63 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1051 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2350 mm |
