1980 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 1996 Mini MK VII
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VII is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VII. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VII. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 316 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VII. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VII, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | 1996 Mini MK VII | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Mini |
| Model | Murena | MK VII |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2156 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6130 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1051 kg | 735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2040 mm |
