1980 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 2002 Holden Vectra

To start off, 2002 Holden Vectra is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Holden Vectra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Vectra (145 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Vectra should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Vectra weights approximately 479 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Vectra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Holden Vectra has automatic transmission and 1980 Matra-Simca Murena has manual transmission. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Holden Vectra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: