1980 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 4,669 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (282 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1119 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Toyota |
| Model | Murena | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2156 cc | 4669 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 91.7 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.6 mm | 84 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1051 kg | 2170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 5550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3270 mm |
