1980 Matra-Simca Rancho vs. 1985 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 1985 Mercury Lynx is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Mercury Lynx (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Mercury Lynx should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho weights approximately 107 kg more than 1985 Mercury Lynx.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Mercury Lynx (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (119 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1985 Mercury Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Matra-Simca Rancho | 1985 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Mercury |
Model | Rancho | Lynx |
Year Released | 1980 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1442 cc | 1859 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 119 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1132 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2400 mm |