1980 Matra-Simca Rancho vs. 2001 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2001 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 1,442 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2001 ZAZ Wagon. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho should accelerate faster than 2001 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho weights approximately 387 kg more than 2001 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho | 2001 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | ZAZ |
| Model | Rancho | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1442 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.7 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 67 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1132 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2330 mm |
