1980 Matra-Simca Rancho vs. 2002 Peugeot Sesame
To start off, 2002 Peugeot Sesame is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Peugeot Sesame is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Peugeot Sesame (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Peugeot Sesame (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (119 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Peugeot Sesame will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho | 2002 Peugeot Sesame | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Peugeot |
| Model | Rancho | Sesame |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1442 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 119 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
