1980 Matra-Simca Rancho vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (152 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (119 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Matra-Simca Rancho | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Renault |
Model | Rancho | Megane |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1442 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 119 Nm | 152 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.7 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |