1980 Matra-Simca Rancho vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2004 Spyker C8 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2004 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Spyker C8 weights approximately 218 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Because 2004 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Spyker |
| Model | Rancho | C8 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1442 cc | 3999 cc |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1132 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 100 L |
