1980 Matra-Simca Rancho vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 163 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (119 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Holden |
| Model | Rancho | UTE |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1442 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 119 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
