1980 Mazda 121 vs. 2000 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2000 Skoda Octavia is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Skoda Octavia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 275 kg more than 1980 Mazda 121.
Because 1980 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mazda 121 | 2000 Skoda Octavia | |
| Make | Mazda | Skoda |
| Model | 121 | Octavia |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2520 mm |
