1980 Mazda 121 vs. 2012 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2012 Dodge Challenger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 629 kg more than 1980 Mazda 121.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 121 | 2012 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Mazda | Dodge |
Model | 121 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1739 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5022 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2946 mm |