1980 Mazda 323 vs. 2000 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2000 Smart ForFour is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Smart ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Smart ForFour weights approximately 100 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Because 1980 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 323 | 2000 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Mazda | Smart |
Model | 323 | ForFour |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1415 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |