1980 Mazda 323 vs. 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada
To start off, 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Because 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada has automatic transmission and 1980 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 1980 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 323 | 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | 323 | Bravada |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1415 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 271 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2880 mm |