1980 Mazda 323 vs. 2002 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2002 Skoda Octavia is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Skoda Octavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Skoda Octavia (99 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 370 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Skoda Octavia (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Skoda Octavia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 323 | 2002 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Mazda | Skoda |
Model | 323 | Octavia |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |