1980 Mazda 323 vs. 2008 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2008 Toyota Matrix is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Matrix (126 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 475 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Matrix (165 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 323 | 2008 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 323 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 126 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |