1980 Mazda 323 vs. 2011 Ford Escape
To start off, 2011 Ford Escape is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Escape weights approximately 688 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Because 1980 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Escape, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Ford Escape has automatic transmission and 1980 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 1980 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Escape will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mazda 323 | 2011 Ford Escape | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 323 | Escape |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 985 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1498 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1725 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2619 mm |
