1980 Mazda 323 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 900 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 323 | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 323 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 71 L |