1980 Mazda 626 vs. 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900
To start off, 1980 Mazda 626 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1980 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 626 | 1953 Alfa Romeo 1900 | |
Make | Mazda | Alfa Romeo |
Model | 626 | 1900 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1884 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2710 mm |