1980 Mazda 626 vs. 1976 Mini MK III
To start off, 1980 Mazda 626 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mini MK III would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 626 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1976 Mini MK III.
Because 1980 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Mini MK III, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 626 | 1976 Mini MK III | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | 626 | MK III |
Year Released | 1980 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2040 mm |