1980 Mazda 626 vs. 1995 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1995 Ford Windstar is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Windstar weights approximately 645 kg more than 1980 Mazda 626.
Because 1980 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mazda 626 | 1995 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 626 | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1920 mm |
