1980 Mazda 626 vs. 1997 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1997 Honda CR-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Honda CR-V weights approximately 455 kg more than 1980 Mazda 626.
Because 1980 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 626 | 1997 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | 626 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1980 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2620 mm |