1980 Mazda 626 vs. 2006 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2006 Nissan Micra is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 626 weights approximately 2 kg more than 2006 Nissan Micra.
Because 1980 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 626 | 2006 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 626 | Micra |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1240 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 64 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2440 mm |