1980 Mazda 626 vs. 2012 Audi Q5
To start off, 2012 Audi Q5 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi Q5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Audi Q5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 626 | 2012 Audi Q5 | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | 626 | Q5 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2807 mm |