1980 Mazda 929 vs. 1969 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1980 Mazda 929 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda 929 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1969 Triumph 1300. (61 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 929 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1969 Triumph 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mazda 929 (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 929 | 1969 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 929 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 61 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 53 L |