1980 Mazda 929 vs. 1973 Peugeot 304
To start off, 1980 Mazda 929 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Peugeot 304. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Peugeot 304 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda 929 (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1973 Peugeot 304. (64 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 1973 Peugeot 304. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 929 weights approximately 202 kg more than 1973 Peugeot 304. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Peugeot 304, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mazda 929 (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Peugeot 304. (94 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1980 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Peugeot 304.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 929 | 1973 Peugeot 304 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 929 | 304 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 67.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2600 mm |