1980 Mazda 929 vs. 1990 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mazda 929 | 1990 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 929 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4690 mm |
