1980 Mazda 929 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (88 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 929 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mazda 929 (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (131 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1980 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 929 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 929 | Clio |
Year Released | 1980 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 80.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |