1980 Mazda 929 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 124 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier (183 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 929 | 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 929 | Cavalier |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2190 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1194 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 57 L |