1980 Mazda 929 vs. 2001 Renault Clio
To start off, 2001 Renault Clio is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Renault Clio (230 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Renault Clio weights approximately 630 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mazda 929 (135 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 1980 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mazda 929 | 2001 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 929 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |
