1980 Mazda 929 vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 510 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 929 | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | 929 | CL |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |