1980 Mazda 929 vs. 2002 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2002 MCC ForTwo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda 929 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2002 MCC ForTwo. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 929 weights approximately 390 kg more than 2002 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mazda 929 (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC ForTwo. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 929 | 2002 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | 929 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 70 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 1810 mm |