1980 Mazda 929 vs. 2002 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2002 Samsung SM3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Samsung SM3 (95 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Samsung SM3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Samsung SM3 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 135 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mazda 929 | 2002 Samsung SM3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Samsung |
| Model | 929 | SM3 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2540 mm |
