1980 Mazda 929 vs. 2002 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2002 Smart ForFour is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Smart ForFour (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 929 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2002 Smart ForFour.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mazda 929 (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Smart ForFour. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1980 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 929 | 2002 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Mazda | Smart |
Model | 929 | ForFour |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 47 L |