1980 Mazda 929 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda 929 (83 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 929 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mazda 929 (135 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1980 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mazda 929 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Mazda | MCC |
| Model | 929 | Smart |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 73 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 84.8 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 47 L |
