1980 Mazda 929 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Megane weights approximately 268 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (184 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 929 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 929 | Megane |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2490 mm |