1980 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-150 (292 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1282 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-150 (433 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 929 | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 929 | F-150 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 433 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 2352 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5885 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2004 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1887 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 98 L |