1980 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2010 Nissan Cube is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Cube (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Cube weights approximately 247 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Cube (172 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 929 | 2010 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 929 | Cube |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1317 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4001 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |