1980 Mazda 929 vs. 2011 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC70 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo XC70 (240 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 738 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo XC70 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 929 | 2011 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 929 | XC70 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1808 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4839 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1603 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2814 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |