1980 Mazda 929 vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,964 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929.
Because 2012 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Mazda 929 | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | 929 | TT |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |